“Linguistic determinism” and Limits of the “Thinkable”

I think I first came across this idea in a Paul Graham essay, [ beating the averages | emphasis added ]:

You can’t trust the opinions of the others, because of the Blub paradox: they’re satisfied with whatever language they happen to use, because it dictates the way they think about programs.

C2wiki’s critique for the [ essay | blub paradox ].

Linguistic ping back: [ Linguistic Determinism ] [ Sapir / Whorf ] [ Alfred Korzybski ]

[ Programming Languages Shape Thoughts ] and [ Martin Rinard, teaching general thinking through programming concepts ]

And I was thinking about neural equilibration. [ Clarence Luther Herrick: from the 1890s ]
[ The Equilibration of Neural Propositions ]: such a beautiful name for a paper!

Should I print a T-shirt reading *languageParanoid* now?

Also…